If you compare what rating percentile you're in on Lichess and on chess.com, it usually becomes very obvious that a huge share of chess.com users is beginners and very casual players. I'm 99% sure the chess-com percentiles are based on every account that has ever joined the site (ie: people who lost one or two games and never came back) because ...If you look at the lichess blitz rating distributions, you can see 11% of players are 1200 or below. 11% seems like a reasonable size for a beginner group. Edit: And as others have pointed out, the rating pool (USCF, FIDE, Chess.com, lichess) etc plays a big factor too.The moderator team of r/chessbeginners wishes to remind everyone of the community rules. Posting spam, advertising links (including YouTube chess tutorial videos without context), and memes is not allowed.We encourage everyone to report these kinds of posts so they can be dealt with.Chess.com vs Lichess. There seems to be a fair amount of jerks on chess.com i.e trolling, taunting, stalling etc. That's usually the app where I play. I've used Lichess a few times and my opponents seem to be nicer. Quick to chat, offer a take back when I blunder, a small sample size.ASilverRook 2000 Lichess and Chess.com • 2 yr. ago. The answer is yes, a 1500 should easily win against a GM with queen odds. The GM will try to complicate the game, and maybe in blitz or bullet the GM will be able to make enough tricks, but in rapid or classical, the 1500 should win almost 100% of the time.Chess.com vs Lichess.org - The ultimate comparison 1. Interface and Design: - Chess.com has a polished and professional interface, with various themes, cosmetics, and customizations available for premium members. - Lichess.org offers a cleaner and simpler design known for its minimalism, and all customizations are available for free. 2. Cost: I made the mistake of jumping straight into a super fast game in Lichess and made awful mistakes before resigning. I took some time to relearn my things, played against the computer, and did a Blitz game of 30 minutes on the Chess.com app and won it without much difficulty, raising me from the starting 800 to 900something.Oh and the difference between chesscom and lichess is ~250-300, lichess being higher. Your chess.com rating is actually pretty high for 1000 on Lichess. Most Lichess 1000s are around 500 on chess.com. Yes totally normal. Lichess is around 300 points higher than chess.com for low ratings. shanidshaan5678. May 24, 2021. 0. #1. In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit. Hamnder663. May 24, 2021. 0. #2.9 comments. Best. 1850 chesscom would be like ~1600 USCF and like ~1400-1500 FIDE or so. Source: Lichess 2050 (peak 2150) getting 1700 PR in OTB blitz events and being happy because I had a great tournament. I had my first OTB tournament last month. I'm around 1400 chesscom blitz but registered for the open section.Last Updated: 1/1/2023 The Chess.com ratings map pretty closely to USCF and FIDE ratings overall. You can use it generally as a quick mapping to your USCF rating. USCF ratings start at 100, and the Chess.com equivalent is slightly under 500. Between 100 and 1750, the 400-point gap shrinks as the rating-level increases.I play a lot of 3|0 blitz on both platforms. I just broke 1200 on Lichess and so fairly well for the most part. I'm rarely flustered and have a lot of fun games. Chess.com is a totally different story. Trying to break 700 still, getting close but always end up dropping to 600.Chess.com has excellent learning material for new players, and I find its user interface more intuitive in many places vs. lichess.org. Chess24.com has good coverage of the chess world, but for playing and learning... meh. Pros: Completely free and open source, good interface for web, great community.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit Platform comparison-Chess.com vs Lichess.com I have observed that Lichess players are more vengeful than Chess.com players, 8 out of 10 times you would get a rematch request after a game while in chess.com almost never.This can help you "translate" the different ratings. As you can see, 1250 Chesscom Blitz is roughly equal to 1460 Lichess Blitz, for example. On lichess you start at a higher elo so the entire player base has a higher average rating. different chess sites, different players, different way to measure the ratings and so on.All about the game of chess, including discussions on professional tournaments, game analysis and theory. ... View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Playing chess in a Steam Deck! This thread is archived ... White to play: chess.com | lichess.org | The position occurred in many games. Link to the games. Videos:Lichess has constant people who start games and then it aborts. Chess.com has somehow pretty effectively stamped this out. It’s the reason I play chess.com and not lichess. It’s hard to tell who has stronger players. I played a 1757 (!) on lichess who blundered his Queen in the Scandinavian on move 5. I seriously don't get this thing about ...Two significant updates later brings this new overhaul to the Lichess puzzle system, and I'm genuinely pleased with the breadth at all levels and the solutions to the harder puzzles. The motifs are not only there in puzzles, but compared to chess.com, they're categorized prior to player feedback.474k members in the chess community. The home of chess on Reddit. Press J to jump to the feed. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. Search within r/chess. r/chess. ... lichess blitz and standard ratings are significantly higher for most players than fide/uscf.I solved hundreds, even thousands of tactics on lichess and Chess Tempo when I first started. My Chess Tempo rating was in the 1900's while my USCF was around 1000, and I first hit 2000 in CT before I'd made 1200 USCF. The essential problem is that you need to play games to practice and apply what you've improved through solving puzzles.Coming from someone whos played thousands of of games on chess.com and hundreds on lichess (2 different accounts per website) lichess is more casual, and is free. They offer free lessons and tactics. With chess.com the player base is bigger, they offer much more efficient and a wide variety of learning tools. GM Robert Hess: Even before becoming involved with Chess.com's cheat detection system, I was impressed by the site's dedication to upholding fair play. I can personally attest to the diligence and prowess of Roland and his team; they have spent countless hours innovating and fine-tuning their algorithms to categorically prevent misconduct, and have successfully implemented an objective system ...1. Beautiful-Iron-2 • Above 2000 Elo • 7 mo. ago. This seems really low tbh. It differs a lot more than I think people like to admit. My chess.com rapid is usually the same as OTB, blitz is usually lower than OTB. Lichess is usually +300 for me. 3. JimemySWE • 1600-1800 Elo • 7 mo. ago.CHESS.COM vs LICHESS ... Sort: Oldest shanidshaan5678 May 24, 2021 0 #1 In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit Hamnder663 May 24, 2021 0 #2Chess has long been regarded as a game of strategy and mental prowess. It is often associated with grandmasters, intense tournaments, and complex strategies. Chess is renowned for its ability to develop critical thinking skills.I like chess.com but their server is crap. Lichess has a better, cleaner more user friendly layout and I’ve never had any issues with their servers, so for this reason I use lichess. As far as the difference in numerical ranking goes: just pay attention to percentile, it gives you a better idea of where you’re at.A good strategy could be "play blitz until you are stuck at some rating point then play rapid for some time and come back to blitz to see if you improved". For me, maintaing a gap of around 150 in blitz and rapid rating works good (with blitz < rapid) (whenever the gap is disturbed, i try to stabilize the gap). I play on lichess.That makes a huge difference. That means a score of 2100 on lichess is "1.4 times better than average" (which is an oversimplification of how Elo is really calculated and what it represents) whereas a score of 1800 of chesscom is "1.5 times better than average", which is a very minor difference. Share.chess.com starting rating is a few hundred points lower than on lichess, so you can think of it like all the ratings are shifted slightly by that amount (this is only really true for lower levels where there are a lot of players, at higher levels chess.com ratings are super inflated). Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...r/chess Rules. 1. Keep the discussion civil and friendly. 2. Don't engage in abusive, discriminatory, or bigoted behavior. 3. Low-effort submissions are not allowed. 4. Do not use /r/chess exclusively to promote your own content.As you get closer to 1500 it becomes 500 point difference a s the collapsing point is around 2300 lichess. Edit Chesscom. For FIDE take away another 200 is what I hear consistently. It's not perfect but this site has I think the most realistic comparison of the most popular rating systems.GM Alireza Firouzja is 3115 Chess.com blitz and 2750 FIDE blitz. (I rounded the numbers to nearest 5.) Also, 50th percentile on Chess.com is just around 1200 (somewhere a smidge above that), while it's 1500 on Lichess. What this means is that at 1200 Chess.com, a player is better than roughly 50% of Chess.com players - and at 1500 Lichess, a ... Let's look at the data: After e4 e5 Nf3 Nc6 the most common move on lichess is Bc4 with 12.4million occurences, the second most common move is Bb5 with 8.3million occurences, so actually the Italian is more played on Lichess as well, nearly 50% more often than the Ruy Lopez. I don't think chess.com has a general opening explorer, so I can't ...Lichess Moderators Condone Cheating with Unethical Shadowban Policies. Lichess Mods need to FULLY Explain the policy on Shadow-Banning. (4) Using the REPORT button to report LEGITIMATE CHEATERS or any other kind of troll gets IGNORED and doesn't register (but the shadow banned person is UNAWARE of this). Essentially the mods set it up where ...I think for these validated players - maybe pulling their historical lichess ratings and their historical FIDE ratings could help enlarge the sample size. AnnualUse9202 • 2 yr. ago. I like this analysis. My peak ratings: LiChess Blitz = 1953 * 0.9074 + 41.4256 = 1814. LiChess Rapid = 2075 * 0.7962 + 309.9946 = 1962.Elo-based rating systems measure win ratios within a pool of players - that's it. (If anything, lichess ratings are more accurate than FIDE, as they use glicko2 instead of the old pure Elo rating system). Not at all. You can never compare ratings across systems, but particularly with lichess. A 1500 on lichess is likely somewhere in the 1000 ...64 game match between the new Stockfish 14 and Lichess's level 8 AI. When Stockfish 14 was released to the public almost 3 weeks ago, I decided to test it out against Lichess's highest level computer, their level 8 AI. Two of the games had each engine play each other from the starting position, while the other 62 came from the opening choices ...On desktop computer, the only answer is both, chesscom isn't buggy at all there. com for better pieces and board styles, premoves, news and forums, 960 tourneys. lichess for all other tourneys, unlimited analysis, unlimited puzzles, and a great 3D wooden set to practice OTB. [deleted] • 3 yr. ago.Right, but the first 25 moves basically match Stockfish in a novel position so it definitely has some generalization ability. Which is why I find it interesting that it then forgets the rules completelyIt seems ratings on Lichess are in general a bit higher than on chess.com (and chess24 is even higher from what I've heard), but anecdotally it's usually around 100-200 difference or so. Almost 800 rating difference seems extreme. If you keep playing games on both platforms I'm sure the gap will close at least a bit.At low Elo, the difference tends to be very large. Some students of mine are around 1000 on Lichess and 300-400 on chessdotcom. The difference gets progressively smaller as the Elo increases, in my experience at around 1600-1700 the Elo are equivalent across sites. Above 2000, I personally feel Lichess players are stronger, but I have little ...Chess.com tactics are a bit inpractical, but at least there's only one clear winning or drawing line. It does seem to me like Lichess selects for engine-like precision rather than practical applications of tactics. chess.com has far more, at least in the ~1600 tactics rating level.Chess.com arguably has a lot more smurfs and cheaters than Lichess. But on to the basic note, Lichess ratings are just more inflated than Chess.com’s. Everyone is saying the starting ratings are different and that's the reason for the discrepancy but you can choose your starting rating on chess.com.I believe that the consensus is that chess.com 's paid for features are better than lichess's free features, but lichess is free and not that much different. 7788445511220011 • 2 yr. ago. I'd also maybe suggest that lichess has been improving in areas that were lacking, with things like themed puzzles, puzzle rush, indicators for blunder etc ...In general, all of the feature's available on lichess are just a little a bit better on chess.com.A lot of this comes down to having more resources. chess.com's Game Review feature is better - there is AI involved that will explain in words why a particular move is better - though the feature is still in it's early stages.The game review feature also does a better job at ranking which moves ...As someone who plays puzzles more than chess (daily and sometimes for hours) Lichess has signficantly poorer puzzles. Very obvious forks at 2500 lichess level, simple doubling, pinned pieces. Chess d com has some really obscure stuff at the 2800 level which running through an engine shows depth. I know chess d com bad but for puzzles not so much. So grosso modo the ranking difference between lichess and chess dot com is about 400 points. It's more like 200-300 points unless you're very low rated. The higher rated you are, the smaller the difference is. It's almost exactly 300 point difference at lichess 1200, but then at 2300 it's exactly 200 points.700 on lichess is a complete beginner. You should be able to hit 1200-1500 within the first year with hard work. Chess is not easy. Give it time. greenhope42 • 1 yr. ago. That sounds about right. 700 is beginner on Lichess and 250 on chess,com would be a similar beginner level. Rating will change across time controls.You lost rating because lichess doesn't see mate in 2 a solution if there is a mate in 1 available, since the mate in 1 is better. That's the only reason you didn't get this puzzle. If you played any of the mate in 1s in this quzzle, they would all count as solutions because they are equivalent. Chizzle76 • 6 mo. ago.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com lessons vs lichess study tab (or other chess websites) vs books vs YouTube, for an absolute beginner . My elo on chess.com is 250 and 800 on lichess. But I want to get better and get a little more serious about chess. And signing up for a chess school is not an ...Lichess.org has no advertisements. All features are free. Whereas free membership on Chess.com limits you to daily 5 puzzles, and 4 move deep opening explorer. At the end of each game there is an advertisement in the score pop-up box (unless you are using an ad-blocker browser extension). Chess.com has journalists.Really sucks losing 20 points on a tactic after solving 5 for 4 points each but i like that they're untimed. Lichess tactics are quite simple I have found. I’ve been playing chess for 2 months and I’m 2075 rating. I would think my chess rating was 1000-1200.even when I'm playing on chess.com, I'm always going straight to lichess afterwards and import the games I wanna analyse. Now I feel stupid. I just used to take the pgn and put it in an analysis board (edit: on lichess), but I could have also imported it and requested a computer analysis, which is not necessary, but more convenient.The only difference is based on rating formulas, so that average is somewhere else. Usually on lichess 1200, on chess.com 1000 or so. Use the logic: if rating pools mattered, then you could launch the same EXACT formula in another website with similar amounts of players and get completely different average numbers, like 1800 vs 1100.Both sites are equally good, given some non-free extra-features for Chesscom. I play Chesscom and Lichess everyday. In the end I'm able to play competitive chess on both, with a fair enough elo system and a quick matchmaking, so I guess they both complete the original mission of a chess application.I believe that the consensus is that chess.com 's paid for features are better than lichess's free features, but lichess is free and not that much different. 7788445511220011 • 2 yr. ago. I'd also maybe suggest that lichess has been improving in areas that were lacking, with things like themed puzzles, puzzle rush, indicators for blunder etc ...Again I agree that Lichess is better. Just pointing out that you can see best moves for free on chess.com. For me it's much easier to analyze with the best five moves already drawn as arrows and that's only possible in lichess. To understand a position on chess.com quickly you have to be very good at chess notation. The engine will take you through your mistakes and blunders and you can try to correct them. Its a lot less intuitive and helpful than the coach feature on chess.com but its something. Lichess could be a lot better from a UI/UX perspective but im guessing they are operating with less than 5% of the resources chess.com has.This website has a very handy chart for comparison that I use. On both sites you're above median by about 200 points. Weirdly enough my rapid rating on Lichess is 100 higher than yours, but 300 higher on Chess.com. A conversion chart I found would put 1800 at 1450 on Chess.com, so I think we're both probably a bit underrated on Chess.com.You don't compare the number, you compare the percentile in the pool. If you are top 10% on lichess, you will probably be top 10% on chess.com. Slightly lower on lichess though, at least in blitz. The pool of blitz players on lichess is significantly stronger. Most casual players google "chess" and end up on chess dot com which makes the pool ...Also, please, be kind in your replies and comments. Some people here just want to learn chess and have virtually no idea about certain chess concepts. I am a bot, and this action was performed automatically. Please contact the moderators of this subreddit if you have any questions or concerns.The percentile is calculated differently, our better formulated the term activate chess player is. 'All' streamers play on chess.com because they think it is the best website they have have a reward program. So newer players who watch a video on YT will likely more go to chess.com and they will stick there. Because of that, newer player friends will also go to chess.com and stick there.After 18 games of 10 + 0, I am at 970, which according to their stats is in the 51st percentile, which is a huge difference from where I'm at amongst Lichess users. My reading is that chess.com might have a wider userbase of more casual players and that Lichess has more serious players, so you need a higher rating to rank among Lichess users ...As someone who plays puzzles more than chess (daily and sometimes for hours) Lichess has signficantly poorer puzzles. Very obvious forks at 2500 lichess level, simple doubling, pinned pieces. Chess d com has some really obscure stuff at the 2800 level which running through an engine shows depth. I know chess d com bad but for puzzles not so much. Lichess could use starting elo 10,000 if they wanted and again just end up with a different scale. Your argument is like saying FIDE ELO is inflated because nobody has ELO less than 100 and so the decimal point should be moved to make GM's ratings 24-28 and normal people would have ratings 1-20. 1.GM Robert Hess: Even before becoming involved with Chess.com's cheat detection system, I was impressed by the site's dedication to upholding fair play. I can personally attest to the diligence and prowess of Roland and his team; they have spent countless hours innovating and fine-tuning their algorithms to categorically prevent misconduct, and have successfully implemented an objective system ...So around 300 points difference. Above 1600 Lichess, and the story flips, with players generally keeping up with 1300-1500 on chessdotcom. But it is mostly because of different playing styles, when you finally learn how to play simple chess (1700+ on either side) then the playing styles become very similar.Puzzles, those are free elsewhere. I think it's worth it if you want to improve. You can essentially get it free on lichess but personally I find the analysis easier to digest on chess.com. I had diamond for a year. Insides are ok but you will check it maybe few times. Unlimited puzzles and engine analysis is good.Reality is not that simple. Ideology (everything should be free! profit is bad! free chess!) is a big simplification of reality. Simplifications always lead to human suffering. You can get …Online chess = Garbage. Don't give any money or energy to lichess.con or chess.con. The negative mind spaces you will visit after playing so many cheats is not worth your beautiful energy or well being. Play over-the-board. The battle for energy will at least be fair. Thank me later :) Peace <3 1 week later: The cheat is still not banned.This website has a very handy chart for comparison that I use. On both sites you're above median by about 200 points. Weirdly enough my rapid rating on Lichess is 100 higher than yours, but 300 higher on Chess.com. A conversion chart I found would put 1800 at 1450 on Chess.com, so I think we're both probably a bit underrated on Chess.com.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Lichess > Chess.com. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best ... lichess good, fuck chess.com capitalist proprietary shit. lichess is open source.The rating system on lichess is an improvement on the one at chess.com. Chess.com uses Glicko, lichess uses Glicko 2 (electric bugaloo). I have made the switch to Lichess due to connectivity errors, but it seems a lot of your criticisms are plusses. Takebacks: mouse slips suck.I wouldn't say it's good for anyone who cares about chess, but a chess.com 1200 would absolutely destroy anyone who just knows the rules and plays rarely. Even at 1100 you're in the 80th percentile on chess.com, which probably means you're better than 99% of all the people in the world who know how the pieces move.To summarize, lichess ratings generally tend to be higher than chess.com ratings, which could indicate that lichess ratings may not be as accurate. However, it is important to consider the differences in player pools, rating algorithms, and the subjective nature of rating systems. Personal experiences can vary, and it is ultimately up to the ...Mar 24, 2022. 0. #42. Most serious players use Lichess unless they're sponsored. Lichess is better for reasons such as better/quicker analysis, free puzzles and the studying resources. The only upside to chess.com is it's chess learning videos, rating system, and the bots to play against. But you can't beat free and if you're 2000+ Lichess is ...Edit: 2200 on chess.com is nowhere near 2400-2500 on lichess youre delusional, its 2350 at MOST. i am on lichess on bullet, blith, rapid and calssical 1700-1800, but on chess my ratingsare around 1150 no joke lol, my highest rating on chess.com is classical which is around 1320. Play more and you will get better, also the younger you are, the ... , ,
A history attached to an ip address could bias an investigation. Evading a Lichess' ban's against Lichess' TOS and can get one IP-banned. Trust me, nothing'll happen to them if they appeal, get permission to create a new account, and don't cheat. Evading bans worsens one's situation and goes against the TOS.. Lichess vs chess com reddit
Lichess is basing it on active players where as chess.com is basing it on all players. Orcahhh. Not really. Chesscom players are just considered active for longer (3 months instead of 1 week) 1 yr. ago. lichess players are just better. __Jimmy__ 1 yr. ago. You know, being called "chess.com" is pretty OP for advertising.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. chess.com vs lichess experience for noob players . I just started playing on chess.com app. my elo is 1200 peak rapid on lichess and currently at 850 on chess.com. My biggest takeaway is every mf and their mother on chess.com tries to force check with queen bishop at the ...Yes. I believe 100-200 points higher than USCF, at least 200 higher than chess.com last I played at chess.com (yes, I do think chess.com ratings are actually a bit lower than USCF for blitz anyway). CatalystoftheMind • 7 yr. ago. My lichess rating has always been significantly higher than my chess.com rating.Free and easy to use : r/lichess. Lichess Desktop App out now! Free and easy to use. I have a lot of tabs open in my browsers (yes, browser s) and I want Lichess to have a special place on my computer. That's why I packaged lichess.org into a desktop app for Linux and Windows! Feel free to download your version. It is free of charge of course.Lichess's rating can be 200-300 points higher than chess.com because the default starting rating (which is a convention choice in any rating system) is 300 points higher than chess.com 's one (1500 vs. 1200). You could say that chess.com 's rating is closer to actual FIDE rating, but that's also inaccurate because 1) those ratings refer to ... Lichess uses an algorithm to draw puzzles from games in its archive. The algorithm looks for positions where one move is considerably stronger than all other options (or is mating). So it makes sense that it kicks up a lot of tactics and endgames. Not sure how chess.com generates its puzzles. I feel like lichess puzzles are way more instructive ... Play lichess.org. Create a game Arena tournaments Swiss tournaments Simultaneous exhibitions. Puzzles. Puzzles Puzzle Dashboard Puzzle Streak Puzzle Storm Puzzle Racer. Learn. Chess basics Practice Coordinates Study Coaches. Watch. Lichess TV Current games Streamers Broadcasts Video library. Community. Players Teams Forum Blog. Tools.Chess.com vs Lichess rating. What would a 1600 elo rating be on chess.com? Around 1300-1400. Atleast that's what my rating on chess.com amd lichess differ by. I've heard others say that its a 200ish elo point gap between the 2 sites!Lichess new Opening explorer feature is absolutely superb :) 478. 54. r/chess. Join. • 12 days ago.Lichess is 1000 years ahead in technology. For Lichess, the pawns on b7 and g7 look like cute little mice, so I'm gonna have to go with Lichess. Lichess is better but Chess. com has copious amounts of cash. Obv. chess.c*m is better as lichess' arrows have little gaps as …That makes a huge difference. That means a score of 2100 on lichess is "1.4 times better than average" (which is an oversimplification of how Elo is really calculated and what it represents) whereas a score of 1800 of chesscom is "1.5 times better than average", which is a very minor difference. Share.Many users prefer Lichess's UI and UX to Chess.com's. There are also philosophical differences between the two sites: Lichess is ad free and subsists on donations, while Chess.com is a profit-over-everything-else business. People don't typically like paywalls for features when free alternatives exist. Furthermore, there are cultural differences ...I've experienced the entire range between 900 and 2100 on Lichess and used to get substantially more toxicity. Now it's a very rare occurence. Yea but people lower rated (I'm 1300 chess.com and 1600 Lichess) don't really …The interface difference certainly affects gameplay, I play much worse on chess.com.There is no actual way to convert ratings because both use different rating systems and initial rating but in general chess.com rating lags behind lichess ratings till 2000~ and then they are pretty close mostly.Reality is not that simple. Ideology (everything should be free! profit is bad! free chess!) is a big simplification of reality. Simplifications always lead to human suffering. You can get …I am a low rated player of about 1600 on lichess and 1350 on Chess.com. In order to improve my game recently, I decided to use one of the amazing plug-ins mentioned in one of the posts a couple of weeks ago. The results on chess.com were amazing.Chesstempo has a very huge library and they also do something similar to Lichess where they make tactics puzzles based on games played on their server. Correction: chesstempo uses master games, not games played on their server. Subjectively, the feel of the problems is quite different from Lichess problems.Chess.com standard is roughly in line with USCF, Lichess is 200-300 points higher. I think chess.com rating is more like +/- 300 that of FIDE. But as someone else noted, lichess's ratings are inflated. Chess.com has more members and I think that plays some role in the rating score you have.Many people prefer lichess due to the variety of options it offers, and also because it's open source and ad-free. Chess.com got a big advantage by claiming the website name early. I personally use chess.com, I'm just used to it and I think it looks cleaner. If you just wanna play chess, it pretty much doesn't matter, but for good options ...This also skips over some amazing chesscom FREE features: Chess.tv with great streams at all time, that promote creators and provide interesting content all day. The blogs, articles, forums that have no equivalent. chesscom/events, to follow chess tournaments, is better than lichess's or chess24's alternative.Played chess for 2.5 years and I've never seen anything like this...a literal zombie cheater account that can ignore chess.com's account closure and continue to play rated games. r/chessbeginners • Pretty effective tactic to play with the London that has gotten me mate three times in the last five games I have playedMaia is a human-like neural network chess engine. This version was trained by learning from over 10 million Lichess games between 1100s. Maia Chess is an ongoing research project aiming to make a more human-friendly, useful, and fun chess AI. For more information go to maiachess.com. You can also play against @maia5 and @maia9.Lichess Moderators Condone Cheating with Unethical Shadowban Policies. Lichess Mods need to FULLY Explain the policy on Shadow-Banning. (4) Using the REPORT button to report LEGITIMATE CHEATERS or any other kind of troll gets IGNORED and doesn't register (but the shadow banned person is UNAWARE of this). Essentially the mods set it up where ...r/chess • You're playing Fischer random as white against Carlsen, who can't see the board and is not told the starting configuration other than what square his king is on. However, the position is still symmetrical and he can hear what moves you make. What's your strategy and do you think you can win?Advertising on Reddit can be a great way to reach a large, engaged audience. With millions of active users and page views per month, Reddit is one of the more popular websites for discussions online. It’s also an incredibly powerful platfor...It over $407,000 per year to run Lichess, and it is supported solely by donations. It's a registered non-profit organization, so all of the money goes solely to invest in free chess, not for anyone's profit. If you are at all able, please consider donating . Free, open-source chess for everyone is something worth investing in.I played at least 12 games (appears to be minimum for Lichess to remove the provisional tag) on both Lichess and Chess.com and had the following records and ratings: Chess.com: Bullet: 661 17-8 Blitz: 675 18-8 Rapid: 730 10-2 Lichess: ... several subreddits are protesting against the new Reddit API pricing and its implications for 3rd-party ...You are correct that lichess and chess.com use different ratings, however that doesn't mean we cannot compare ratings at all. To summarize my answer on …I am a new chess player, currently rated 1500 on lichess against 1.E4 I play the caro kann while it is a good opening, I am getting bored of it 80 percent of the time I play the same advance variation line so I was thinking about switching to a sicillian can anyone recommend good options for someone coming from the caro kannChess.com standard is roughly in line with USCF, Lichess is 200-300 points higher. I think chess.com rating is more like +/- 300 that of FIDE. But as someone else noted, lichess's ratings are inflated. Chess.com has more members and I think that plays some role in the rating score you have.I had the same effect when I switched from lichess to chess.com. the ease of reporting bad sports after each match seems to really curb much of the toxic chat found on lichess. Also the analysis after each game makes it really easy to pick out cheaters. Overall I have found chess.com to be immensely better than lichess.CHESS.COM vs LICHESS ... Sort: Oldest shanidshaan5678 May 24, 2021 0 #1 In recent times chess has got flourished because of lockdown. most of the websites got the benefit of these, people are confused to choose chess.com and lichess both give support to chess study. which is the better one for get more benefit Hamnder663 May 24, 2021 0 #2I play a lot of 3|0 blitz on both platforms. I just broke 1200 on Lichess and so fairly well for the most part. I'm rarely flustered and have a lot of fun games. Chess.com is a totally different story. Trying to break 700 still, getting close but always end up dropping to 600.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com lessons vs lichess study tab (or other chess websites) vs books vs YouTube, for an absolute beginner . My elo on chess.com is 250 and 800 on lichess. But I want to get better and get a little more serious about chess. And signing up for a chess school is not an ...Lichess is very well designed in general, which is nice. Chess.com can be very clunky to navigate. Chess.com has vastly better puzzle features. The puzzles are …The Comparison. Overall, not a huge fan of either site’s UX for these features but Chess.com’s flow and UI is a bit more intuitive than Lichess’s and the friends list is a great addition ...Vincent Keymer is a German grandmaster and the youngest from his country to earn the title. At the 2018 Grenke Open, the 13-year-old prodigy won the event ahead of 49 GMs (including four rated 2700+) with an 8/9 score, which secured his first GM norm and shocked the chess world. Keymer’s performance rating of 2798 was the highest in history ...Again I agree that Lichess is better. Just pointing out that you can see best moves for free on chess.com. For me it's much easier to analyze with the best five moves already drawn as arrows and that's only possible in lichess. To understand a position on chess.com quickly you have to be very good at chess notation.99. 60. r/chess. Join. • 21 days ago. Hikaru on his rivalry vs Magnus: "It wasn't a rivalry until the pandemic. He won every match against me, had a great score against me. Ever since the pandemic I've done better overall. He's one of the two best players of all time, and the fact that I'm able to compete with him makes me very happy."View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. chess.com vs lichess experience for noob players . I just started playing on chess.com app. my elo is 1200 peak rapid on lichess and currently at 850 on chess.com. My biggest takeaway is every mf and their mother on chess.com tries to force check with queen bishop at the ...Online chess = Garbage. Don't give any money or energy to lichess.con or chess.con. The negative mind spaces you will visit after playing so many cheats is not worth your beautiful energy or well being. Play over-the-board. The battle for energy will at least be fair. Thank me later :) Peace <3 1 week later: The cheat is still not banned.Online chess = Garbage. Don't give any money or energy to lichess.con or chess.con. The negative mind spaces you will visit after playing so many cheats is not worth your beautiful energy or well being. Play over-the-board. The battle for energy will at least be fair. Thank me later :) Peace <3 1 week later: The cheat is still not banned.For a week, managed to get 700 ratings rapid. So I thought that it was normal for newbies. And then hear about lichess because it's free nature. But after a few games, I got a big jump to 1700 in rapid. So that raises the question of this difference. My initial thought maybe 1700 in chess is the same as 700 in chess.com.If that's an important issue to you, it's probably worth at least trying ICC. VeniVidiVici42 IM • 5 yr. ago. ICC's community is massively better than any other chess site, and if you're a reasonably strong player (2200+ or so) it's much easier to pick up games instead of having to wait a lot of time.GM Peter Svidler analyzes the epic endgame between Anand and Carlsen: "This is the most study like endgame I have seen in a proper game of chess in a long time. It is like fairytale stuff I am struggling to believe". 447. 32. r/chess.It has way more stuff than lichens, lessons, drills, daily puzzles, chess engine (and yes, I did do a comparison. I used the Chess.com engine against the lichess stockfish engine, and the chess.com engine reacted much faster and did better than stockfish 8 in lichess). And also, some other game modes like puzzle battle and 4 player chess.Well, one thing i learned from lichess training: it's worth sacking your queen for two minor pieces plus a rook, or just two rooks. The hardest part is trying to find the best continuation, their puzzles don't accept a move that's just a few decimal points weaker. Interesting.View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Chess.com Vs Lichess. Related Topics Chess Strategy game Ancient board game Board game Tabletop games comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment HowBen • Additional comment actions ...It's not exact for all the ratings, for exemple, some Grandmasters are 3000 or over on chess.com or lichess, and 2700 FIDE (because they can play rated games more often on chess.com and RD are not the same). The difference of ratings is also due to the fact that the average rating on lichess is 1500 and chess.com is 1000.chess.com for me is very stressful as time is a factor as well. I use this trainer as a test of my tactics rather than actual training. lichess is a site I tried not very long ago, but the tactics trainer is great. The positions comes from games played by the players playing on the site.Analysis comparison Chess.com vs Lichess. My Rh8+ is considered a game losing blunder by Chess.com (going from +2.80 to -2.63). When the forced Kxh8 is followed by Nxe5 the position is suddenly evaluated as +8.30. Lichess assesses the position as around +16 both before and after Rxh8.Lichess vs Chess.com style of play. Does anyone find that the style of chess is different between the two platforms? I know the ranking is different, as my score is about +400 on lichess, but I also find the style of play is different too. Chess.com seems more reserved to me.Edit: 2200 on chess.com is nowhere near 2400-2500 on lichess youre delusional, its 2350 at MOST. i am on lichess on bullet, blith, rapid and calssical 1700-1800, but on chess my ratingsare around 1150 no joke lol, my highest rating on chess.com is classical which is around 1320. Play more and you will get better, also the younger you are, the ...Lichess ELO vs Chess.com ELO. I've recently signed up for Lichess and after 10 games and a bunch of puzzles, my rating in both (1450 in 10 min classical, 1850 tactics) is significantly higher than on chess.com (1250 in 10 min classical, 1350 tactics). Is this a pretty typical rating difference or just a statistical anomaly because of the two ...LiChess vs Chess.com I’m a long time LiChess player and have a blitz rating of about 1600. I’ve recently started playing on chess.com too but I can’t seem to get above 1000-1050.Lichess assigns 1500 as a provisional rating for new players. I believe chess.com uses 1200 instead. As a result chess.com ratings are about 300 points lower than lichess ratings. That's a bit simplistic since everybody is provisional for a while and the rating jumps quite a lot according to that. There are some differences but in general ... I'm wondering if there is a known relationship between ratings on chesstempo and lichess. In my case, I'm rated 1400 in chesstempo blitz tactics, and 1300 in lichess blitz. I believe both sites have ratings which are centered at 1500. In my case, does the higher rating on chesstempo likely mean that tactics are not my major weakness at the moment?. ,